Raw distribution
Available holder count, largest-wallet share and top-10 concentration establish a reproducible starting point.
← Risk toolsHOLDER CONCENTRATION CHECKER
Find who can move the supply.
A top-holder table is only the beginning. NOP Intel separates observable holder concentration from the harder questions of infrastructure, related-wallet control and creator-linked distribution.
No wallet required · Source-linked evidence · Not financial adviceThe result is only as useful as the evidence behind it.
Each layer answers a different risk question. Source failures and unsupported fields remain visible so confidence is not manufactured.
Infrastructure context
Known pools, burn addresses and recognizable infrastructure are separated where possible before insider conclusions.
Creator exposure
Observable creator and owner balances or indexed distribution paths are preserved as distinct evidence.
Attribution limits
Funding paths and synchronized behavior can support a cluster hypothesis, but address ownership is never asserted without evidence.
A decision brief, not a green badge.
The output keeps risk severity and evidence confidence separate. That distinction matters when a clean-looking score rests on incomplete data.
Concentration summary
Largest-wallet and top-10 shares are shown with the available holder breadth.
Entity-labeling warning
Raw addresses are not automatically called insiders, market makers or team wallets.
Creator/owner context
Available creator and owner exposure is displayed separately from general holder concentration.
Premium distribution trail
Supported EVM research can reconstruct indexed mint recipients and later creator-linked movements.
Named sources. Visible coverage.
NOP Intel applies published rules to current third-party and on-chain observations. It does not replace missing data with an AI opinion.
GoPlus Security
Available holder, creator and owner observations
Blockscout-compatible explorers
Premium indexed transfer history on supported EVM chains
GeckoTerminal
Pool addresses and market context used during entity review
Source availability varies by network, address and indexing state. The live report records which configured sources returned usable evidence at analysis time.
HOW TO USE THE RESULT
Resolve the red flags before capital moves.
A NOP Intel report is a research brief, not an investment instruction. Start with hard-stop conditions, then inspect fragile liquidity, concentrated supply and missing evidence. A high score never cancels an unresolved critical question.
How to read a token risk score →INVESTOR CHECKLIST
What to verify after the scan.
Automated triage should shorten manual research—not replace it. Resolve these questions against the original transactions, contracts and market state.
- Label the largest wallets with transactions and contract roles before inferring control.
- Review deployer funding paths and initial supply recipients.
- Inspect vesting beneficiary, schedule, upgradeability and emergency controls.
- Track exchange deposits and large transfers over time, not only current balances.
What the tool can—and cannot—tell you.
- What is a dangerous holder concentration?
- A percentage alone is not a verdict. Control, liquidity, vesting, wallet type and the holder's ability to sell or change supply determine the practical risk.
- Are liquidity pools counted as holders?
- They can appear in raw holder data. NOP Intel excludes recognizable infrastructure where possible and makes remaining uncertainty explicit.
- Can several wallets belong to the same person?
- Yes, and one address can also represent many users. Funding paths and synchronized behavior support investigation but do not by themselves prove common ownership.
VERIFY BEFORE YOU ALLOCATE
Run free analysis →