Creator flow map
Transfers and funding paths are followed from identified deployer or creator addresses, preserving timestamps and transaction links.
NOP INTEL← Risk toolsWALLET RISK ANALYZER
Follow the wallets behind the market.
Contract checks explain what code can do. Wallet forensics investigates what economically connected addresses appear to be doing: receiving allocations, funding new wallets, distributing supply or repeatedly trading both sides.
No wallet required · Source-linked evidence · Not financial adviceThe result is only as useful as the evidence behind it.
Each layer answers a different risk question. Source failures and unsupported fields remain visible so confidence is not manufactured.
No-buy seller screening
Wallets that sell without an observable acquisition in the analyzed window are surfaced for manual explanation.
Two-sided activity
Repeated buys and sells, counterparty overlap and timing are summarized as behavior—not automatically labeled market making.
Attribution discipline
Addresses are labeled only when the evidence supports the relationship; probable clusters remain inferences.
A decision brief, not a green badge.
The output keeps risk severity and evidence confidence separate. That distinction matters when a clean-looking score rests on incomplete data.
Supply Trail
Indexed mint and burn events, initial recipients and creator/owner destinations are reconstructed on compatible EVM explorers.
Observed proceeds
USD sale proceeds appear only when a matching primary-pool swap is observed; transfers are kept separate.
Wallet-flow ranking
Recent initiators are ranked by direction, net flow, dominance, inventory link and two-sided cadence.
Coverage statement
Capped windows, missing prices and incomplete explorer history are reported beside affected totals.
Named sources. Visible coverage.
NOP Intel applies published rules to current third-party and on-chain observations. It does not replace missing data with an AI opinion.
Blockscout-compatible explorers
Indexed EVM transfer, mint and burn history for Supply Trail
GeckoTerminal
Primary-pool trade and price context for recent wallet-flow analysis
GoPlus Security
Creator, owner and holder observations used as investigation anchors
Source availability varies by network, address and indexing state. The live report records which configured sources returned usable evidence at analysis time.
HOW TO USE THE RESULT
Resolve the red flags before capital moves.
A NOP Intel report is a research brief, not an investment instruction. Start with hard-stop conditions, then inspect fragile liquidity, concentrated supply and missing evidence. A high score never cancels an unresolved critical question.
How to read a token risk score →INVESTOR CHECKLIST
What to verify after the scan.
Automated triage should shorten manual research—not replace it. Resolve these questions against the original transactions, contracts and market state.
- Separate initial allocation, transfer, bridge deposit and observed swap before calculating proceeds.
- Inspect funding paths and counterparties before treating wallets as related.
- Compare the analyzed time window with the token's full trading history.
- Ask the project to explain material creator-linked movements with transaction evidence.
What the tool can—and cannot—tell you.
- Can you identify the token creator's wallets?
- NOP Intel can begin with the deployer and observable funding or transfer paths. Related-wallet attribution is expressed with evidence and confidence, not treated as certain identity.
- Can you detect a market maker?
- The analyzer can surface two-sided trading and distribution patterns consistent with several explanations. A pattern alone cannot prove a formal market-making relationship.
- Can wallet analysis estimate sales in USD?
- Where swaps and historical pricing are observable, proceeds can be estimated transaction by transaction. Transfers, deposits and unsourced price gaps must remain separate from realized-sale totals.
VERIFY BEFORE YOU ALLOCATE
Run free analysis →