NOP Intel converts public blockchain, security and market observations into an explainable token risk report. This page documents the complete operating process.
NOP Intel validates EVM, Solana or Tron address formats before requesting external data. A public scan requires no wallet connection and creates no on-chain transaction.
EVM permissions, Solana token authorities or TRC-20 controls are collected independently from market data. Provider failure remains unavailable evidence—not a pass.
The engine produces the same result for the same inputs. Critical conditions cap the score, and missing security evidence caps confidence.
The report tells researchers what evidence changes the case. Paid workflow adds history and monitoring; payment never changes a result.
NOP Intel currently retrieves token-security observations from GoPlus, DEX pool and market data from GeckoTerminal, and public project metadata from CoinGecko when a matching identifier exists.
| Provider | Primary role | Report behavior |
|---|---|---|
| GoPlus | Contract and token-security signals | Observed permissions and risk indicators |
| GeckoTerminal | DEX pools, liquidity and market activity | Current pool and token market observations |
| CoinGecko | Public project metadata | Website, social and repository references as claims |
Raw values and source references available at analysis time.
An explainable conclusion derived from one or more observations.
High, medium or low confidence based on coverage and availability.
Unknown or off-chain facts that require additional diligence.
The 0–100 score is a compact summary. Hard stops can cap it at 34, direct transfer/exit constraints at 18, and incomplete evidence limits confidence.
See category weights and limitations →No. It means the currently observable signals are stronger and the evidence is more complete. New exploits, compromised keys, off-chain agreements and future actions can change the risk.
The score is deterministic. NOP Intel applies explicit rules to named source data; it does not ask a language model to make a buy, sell or safety decision.
No wallet is required for public token analysis. A wallet is used only when a customer intentionally chooses to pay for a plan with supported USDC.
No. Commercial plans provide monitoring, workflow, public proof pages and API access. They cannot suppress a signal or improve a score.
No. Automated research complements—but does not replace—manual code review, professional audits, legal diligence or independent investment judgment.
Run a public analysis without connecting a wallet.